सूर्य कांत is not mentioned in the provided evidence. However, the Supreme Court is mentioned in the article, which discusses the court’s inquiry into how children can have social media accounts. The underlying contracts for these accounts are deemed legally void.
The article does not provide any information about सूर्य कांत. It appears to be unrelated to the topic of the Supreme Court’s inquiry into social media contracts. The article focuses on the legal implications of children having social media accounts and the court’s request for clarification on this matter.
The article does not provide any details about सूर्य कांत’s involvement in this issue or any other context. The term is not mentioned in the text, and it seems to be unrelated to the topic at hand.
In summary, the provided evidence does not provide any information about सूर्य कांत.